[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17494454#comment-17494454
]
Yun Tang commented on FLINK-25528:
----------------------------------
[~liufangqi] Thanks for you explaination. If current state processor API cannot
write native checkpoint, I think we could make a full native checkpoint instead
of a savepoint for state processor API writing. This deserves a patch of
improvement. BTW, I think you can refer to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25276 to change your PR.
> state processor api do not support increment checkpoint
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-25528
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25528
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: API / State Processor, Runtime / State Backends
> Reporter: 刘方奇
> Priority: Major
>
> As the title, in the state-processor-api, we use the savepoint opition to
> snapshot state defaultly in org.apache.flink.state.api.output.SnapshotUtils.
> But in many cases, we maybe need to snapshot state incremently which have
> better performance than savepoint.
> Shall we add the config to chose the checkpoint way just like flink stream
> backend?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
