[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17705914#comment-17705914
]
Alexey Novakov commented on FLINK-23978:
----------------------------------------
Thanks, [~chesnay] .
It is indeed works via reduce function
{code:java}
.reduce {(a, b) => (a._1 , a._2 + b._2)} {code}
Yeah, I have been thinking to make such proposal to copy FieldAccessFactrory
class to flink-adt or to findify/flink-scala-api.
> FieldAccessor has direct scala dependency
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-23978
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23978
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: API / DataStream
> Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
> Assignee: Chesnay Schepler
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.15.0
>
>
> The FieldAccessor class in flink-streaming-java has a hard dependency on
> scala. It would be ideal if we could restrict this dependencies to
> flink-streaming-scala.
> We could move the SimpleProductFieldAccessor & RecursiveProductFieldAccessor
> to flink-streaming-scala, and load them in the FieldAccessorFactory via
> reflection.
> This is one of a few steps that would allow the Java Datastream API to be
> used without scala being on the classpath.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
