[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-31757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17727041#comment-17727041
 ] 

RocMarshal commented on FLINK-31757:
------------------------------------

I have compiled a draft  
[https://docs.google.com/document/d/14WhrSNGBdcsRl3IK7CZO-RaZ5KXU2X1dWqxPEFr3iS8/edit?usp=sharing]
Looking forward   your discussion.  [~fanrui] [~huwh] [~Weijie Guo] [~chesnay] 

> Optimize Flink un-balanced tasks scheduling
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-31757
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-31757
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / Coordination
>            Reporter: RocMarshal
>            Assignee: RocMarshal
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: image-2023-04-13-08-04-04-667.png
>
>
> Supposed we have a Job with 21 {{JobVertex}}. The parallelism of vertex A is 
> 100, and the others are 5. If each {{TaskManager}} only have one slot, then 
> we need 100 TMs.
> There will be 5 slots with 21 sub-tasks, and the others will only have one 
> sub-task of A. Does this mean we have to make a trade-off between wasted 
> resources and insufficient resources?
> From a resource utilization point of view, we expect all subtasks to be 
> evenly distributed on each TM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to