[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-31757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17730871#comment-17730871
 ] 

Rui Fan commented on FLINK-31757:
---------------------------------

Hi [~xtsong] [~zhuzh] [~wanglijie] , you may also be interested in this JIRA 
and look forward to your feedback, thanks~

BTW, I'm not sure whether it should be discussed as a FLIP, because:
 * It may add the public option.
 * It includes 2 parts, the task to slot and slot to TM, it may be done in 
multiple subtasks.

> Optimize Flink un-balanced tasks scheduling
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-31757
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-31757
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / Coordination
>            Reporter: RocMarshal
>            Assignee: RocMarshal
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: image-2023-04-13-08-04-04-667.png
>
>
> Supposed we have a Job with 21 {{JobVertex}}. The parallelism of vertex A is 
> 100, and the others are 5. If each {{TaskManager}} only have one slot, then 
> we need 100 TMs.
> There will be 5 slots with 21 sub-tasks, and the others will only have one 
> sub-task of A. Does this mean we have to make a trade-off between wasted 
> resources and insufficient resources?
> From a resource utilization point of view, we expect all subtasks to be 
> evenly distributed on each TM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to