zentol commented on code in PR #23553: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23553#discussion_r1371714068
########## flink-architecture-tests/flink-architecture-tests-production/archunit-violations/e5126cae-f3fe-48aa-b6fb-60ae6cc3fcd5: ########## @@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ Method <org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.ResourceManagerPartitionTr Method <org.apache.flink.runtime.operators.coordination.RecreateOnResetOperatorCoordinator$DeferrableCoordinator.closeAsync(long)> calls method <org.apache.flink.runtime.operators.coordination.RecreateOnResetOperatorCoordinator$QuiesceableContext.quiesce()> in (RecreateOnResetOperatorCoordinator.java:361) Method <org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskManagerConfiguration.fromConfiguration(org.apache.flink.configuration.Configuration, org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceSpec, java.lang.String, java.io.File)> calls method <org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceUtils.generateDefaultSlotResourceProfile(org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceSpec, int)> in (TaskManagerConfiguration.java:244) Method <org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskManagerConfiguration.fromConfiguration(org.apache.flink.configuration.Configuration, org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceSpec, java.lang.String, java.io.File)> calls method <org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceUtils.generateTotalAvailableResourceProfile(org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceSpec)> in (TaskManagerConfiguration.java:246) -Method <org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskManagerServices.createTaskSlotTable(int, org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceSpec, long, int, java.util.concurrent.Executor)> calls method <org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceUtils.generateDefaultSlotResourceProfile(org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceSpec, int)> in (TaskManagerServices.java:433) -Method <org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskManagerServices.createTaskSlotTable(int, org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceSpec, long, int, java.util.concurrent.Executor)> calls method <org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceUtils.generateTotalAvailableResourceProfile(org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceSpec)> in (TaskManagerServices.java:431) Review Comment: The line numbers have been tripping people up a few times, maybe we should start failing CI if the diff contains changes 🤔 Anyhow, for the PR it's fine I suppose. _Maybe_ move these lines into a separate "regenerate archunit store" commit or something. ########## flink-architecture-tests/flink-architecture-tests-production/archunit-violations/e5126cae-f3fe-48aa-b6fb-60ae6cc3fcd5: ########## @@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ Method <org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.ResourceManagerPartitionTr Method <org.apache.flink.runtime.operators.coordination.RecreateOnResetOperatorCoordinator$DeferrableCoordinator.closeAsync(long)> calls method <org.apache.flink.runtime.operators.coordination.RecreateOnResetOperatorCoordinator$QuiesceableContext.quiesce()> in (RecreateOnResetOperatorCoordinator.java:361) Method <org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskManagerConfiguration.fromConfiguration(org.apache.flink.configuration.Configuration, org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceSpec, java.lang.String, java.io.File)> calls method <org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceUtils.generateDefaultSlotResourceProfile(org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceSpec, int)> in (TaskManagerConfiguration.java:244) Method <org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskManagerConfiguration.fromConfiguration(org.apache.flink.configuration.Configuration, org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceSpec, java.lang.String, java.io.File)> calls method <org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceUtils.generateTotalAvailableResourceProfile(org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceSpec)> in (TaskManagerConfiguration.java:246) -Method <org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskManagerServices.createTaskSlotTable(int, org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceSpec, long, int, java.util.concurrent.Executor)> calls method <org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceUtils.generateDefaultSlotResourceProfile(org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceSpec, int)> in (TaskManagerServices.java:433) -Method <org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskManagerServices.createTaskSlotTable(int, org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceSpec, long, int, java.util.concurrent.Executor)> calls method <org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceUtils.generateTotalAvailableResourceProfile(org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.TaskExecutorResourceSpec)> in (TaskManagerServices.java:431) Review Comment: The line numbers have been tripping people up a few times, maybe we should start failing CI if the diff contains changes 🤔 Anyhow, for the PR it's fine I suppose. _Maybe_ move these lines into a separate "regenerate archunit store" commit or something. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
