[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15671614#comment-15671614
]
Seth Wiesman edited comment on FLINK-3869 at 11/16/16 9:05 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
[~aljoscha] [~ymarzougui] This is an issue I have been following as it affects
a project I am working on. I have a fix that works with both the Java and Scala
api's that I would be happy to contribute.
Edit: To clarify, this is using the reduce, fold api proposed by Aljoscha
above.
was (Author: sjwiesman):
[~aljoscha] [~ymarzougui] This is an issue I have been following as it affects
a project I am working on. I have a fix that works with both the Java and Scala
api's that I would be happy to contribute.
> WindowedStream.apply with FoldFunction is too restrictive
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-3869
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3869
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Streaming
> Reporter: Aljoscha Krettek
> Assignee: Yassine Marzougui
>
> Right now we have this signature:
> {code}
> public <R> SingleOutputStreamOperator<R> apply(R initialValue,
> FoldFunction<T, R> foldFunction, WindowFunction<R, R, K, W> function) {
> {code}
> but we should have this signature to allow users to return a type other than
> the fold accumulator type from their window function:
> {code}
> public <ACC, R> SingleOutputStreamOperator<R> apply(ACC initialValue,
> FoldFunction<T, ACC> foldFunction, WindowFunction<ACC, R, K, W> function) {
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
