[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15701732#comment-15701732
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5026:
---------------------------------------
Github user kl0u commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2788#discussion_r89761160
--- Diff:
flink-streaming-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/functions/co/CoProcessFunction.java
---
@@ -50,7 +46,7 @@
* @param <OUT> Output type.
*/
@PublicEvolving
-public interface TimelyCoFlatMapFunction<IN1, IN2, OUT> extends Function,
Serializable {
+public interface CoProcessFunction<IN1, IN2, OUT> extends Function,
Serializable {
/**
* This method is called for each element in the first of the connected
streams.
--- End diff --
<p>This function can output zero or more elements using the {@link
Collector} parameter
* and also update internal state or set timers using the {@link
Context} parameter.
> Rename TimelyFlatMap to Process
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-5026
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5026
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Streaming
> Reporter: Aljoscha Krettek
> Assignee: Aljoscha Krettek
> Fix For: 1.2.0
>
>
> The method on {{KeyedDataStream}} would be called {{process()}} and the
> function itself would be called {{ProcessFunction}}.
> The reason for this is that {{TimelyFlatMapFunction}} is a bit of a mouthful
> and with the additions to the timer API and state the {{ProcessFunction}}
> could become the basic, low-level, user-facing API for cases where users
> nowadays implement their own operator.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
