snuyanzin commented on code in PR #26856:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/26856#discussion_r2245091674
##########
flink-table/flink-table-planner/src/test/resources/restore-tests/stream-exec-multi-join_1/four-way-complex-updating-join-with-restore/plan/four-way-complex-updating-join-with-restore.json:
##########
@@ -103,22 +103,31 @@
}
}
}
- }
+ },
+ "abilities" : [ {
+ "type" : "ProjectPushDown",
+ "projectedFields" : [ [ 0 ], [ 2 ] ],
+ "producedType" : "ROW<`order_id` VARCHAR(2147483647) NOT NULL,
`user_id_1` VARCHAR(2147483647)> NOT NULL"
+ }, {
+ "type" : "ReadingMetadata",
+ "metadataKeys" : [ ],
+ "producedType" : "ROW<`order_id` VARCHAR(2147483647) NOT NULL,
`user_id_1` VARCHAR(2147483647)> NOT NULL"
+ } ]
},
- "outputType" : "ROW<`order_id` VARCHAR(2147483647) NOT NULL, `product`
VARCHAR(2147483647), `user_id_1` VARCHAR(2147483647)>",
- "description" : "TableSourceScan(table=[[default_catalog,
default_database, Orders]], fields=[order_id, product, user_id_1])"
+ "outputType" : "ROW<`order_id` VARCHAR(2147483647) NOT NULL, `user_id_1`
VARCHAR(2147483647)>",
+ "description" : "TableSourceScan(table=[[default_catalog,
default_database, Orders, project=[order_id, user_id_1], metadata=[]]],
fields=[order_id, user_id_1])"
Review Comment:
do we need this `metadata` with empty array, or can we have metadata here
only if it contains something more meaningful?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
