gustavodemorais commented on PR #27508: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/27508#issuecomment-4037651175
I meant we should create a ticket for 1. and 3. 1. I'd suggest creating the ticket and opening the PR for 1. first since we're already on this topic. 2. I think 2. is not a priority so I'd not create a ticket but up to you. Also, thanks for sharing the benchmark number. That's interesting. 3. For 3. I'd suggest you to do some research to come up with different suggestions and approaches, do a small write up so we pick what's the best one. As I mentioned, in general, we want to reuse as many binary joins rules as possible and at the same time continue to have MultiJoin code and optimizations modular as separated from binary joins. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
