[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15875822#comment-15875822
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5487:
---------------------------------------
Github user tzulitai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3358#discussion_r102185790
--- Diff:
flink-connectors/flink-connector-elasticsearch-base/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/elasticsearch/ElasticsearchSinkBase.java
---
@@ -165,20 +286,36 @@ public void beforeBulk(long executionId, BulkRequest
request) { }
@Override
public void afterBulk(long executionId,
BulkRequest request, BulkResponse response) {
if (response.hasFailures()) {
- for (BulkItemResponse itemResp
: response.getItems()) {
- Throwable failure =
callBridge.extractFailureCauseFromBulkItemResponse(itemResp);
+ BulkItemResponse itemResponse;
+ Throwable failure;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i <
response.getItems().length; i++) {
+ itemResponse =
response.getItems()[i];
+ failure =
callBridge.extractFailureCauseFromBulkItemResponse(itemResponse);
if (failure != null) {
-
LOG.error("Failed Elasticsearch item request: {}", failure.getMessage(),
failure);
-
failureThrowable.compareAndSet(null, failure);
+
LOG.error("Failed Elasticsearch item request: {}",
itemResponse.getFailureMessage(), failure);
+
+ if
(failureHandler.onFailure(request.requests().get(i), failure, requestIndexer)) {
--- End diff --
For the use case you mentioned, that would mean the user implements a
stateful `ActionRequestFailureHandler`, with its state being the number of
failures so far, correct?
I didn't think about this too much, but I guess there shouldn't be a
problem for this.
> Proper at-least-once support for ElasticsearchSink
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-5487
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5487
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Streaming Connectors
> Reporter: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> Assignee: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> Priority: Critical
>
> Discussion in ML:
> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Fault-tolerance-guarantees-of-Elasticsearch-sink-in-flink-elasticsearch2-td10982.html
> Currently, the Elasticsearch Sink actually doesn't offer any guarantees for
> message delivery.
> For proper support of at-least-once, the sink will need to participate in
> Flink's checkpointing: when snapshotting is triggered at the
> {{ElasticsearchSink}}, we need to synchronize on the pending ES requests by
> flushing the internal bulk processor. For temporary ES failures (see
> FLINK-5122) that may happen on the flush, we should retry them before
> returning from snapshotting and acking the checkpoint. If there are
> non-temporary ES failures on the flush, the current snapshot should fail.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
