[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15880057#comment-15880057
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5487:
---------------------------------------
Github user tzulitai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3358#discussion_r102654126
--- Diff:
flink-connectors/flink-connector-elasticsearch-base/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/elasticsearch/ElasticsearchSinkBase.java
---
@@ -211,6 +283,23 @@ public void invoke(T value) throws Exception {
}
@Override
+ public void initializeState(FunctionInitializationContext context)
throws Exception {
+ // no initialization needed
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public void snapshotState(FunctionSnapshotContext context) throws
Exception {
+ checkErrorAndRethrow();
+
+ if (flushOnCheckpoint) {
+ do {
+ bulkProcessor.flush();
--- End diff --
Ah, I see the problem here ...
The bulk processor's internal `bulkRequest.numberOfActions() == 0` will
become `true` as soon as it starts executing the flush, and not after
`afterBulk` is invoked.
So, since our `numPendingRequests` implementation relies on the `afterBulk`
callback, we might have busy loops on `bulkProcessor.flush()` while we wait for
`numPendingRequests` to become 0.
This is quite a nice catch actually! So no worries on bringing it up now.
> Proper at-least-once support for ElasticsearchSink
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-5487
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5487
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Streaming Connectors
> Reporter: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> Assignee: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> Priority: Critical
>
> Discussion in ML:
> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Fault-tolerance-guarantees-of-Elasticsearch-sink-in-flink-elasticsearch2-td10982.html
> Currently, the Elasticsearch Sink actually doesn't offer any guarantees for
> message delivery.
> For proper support of at-least-once, the sink will need to participate in
> Flink's checkpointing: when snapshotting is triggered at the
> {{ElasticsearchSink}}, we need to synchronize on the pending ES requests by
> flushing the internal bulk processor. For temporary ES failures (see
> FLINK-5122) that may happen on the flush, we should retry them before
> returning from snapshotting and acking the checkpoint. If there are
> non-temporary ES failures on the flush, the current snapshot should fail.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
