Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3423#discussion_r103468984
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/runtime/aggregate/AggregateReduceGroupFunction.scala
---
@@ -18,32 +18,33 @@
package org.apache.flink.table.runtime.aggregate
import java.lang.Iterable
+import java.util.{ArrayList => JArrayList}
import org.apache.flink.api.common.functions.RichGroupReduceFunction
import org.apache.flink.configuration.Configuration
+import org.apache.flink.table.functions.{Accumulator, AggregateFunction}
import org.apache.flink.types.Row
import org.apache.flink.util.{Collector, Preconditions}
-import scala.collection.JavaConversions._
-
/**
- * It wraps the aggregate logic inside of
- * [[org.apache.flink.api.java.operators.GroupReduceOperator]].
- *
- * @param aggregates The aggregate functions.
- * @param groupKeysMapping The index mapping of group keys between
intermediate aggregate Row
- * and output Row.
- * @param aggregateMapping The index mapping between aggregate function
list and aggregated value
- * index in output Row.
- * @param groupingSetsMapping The index mapping of keys in grouping sets
between intermediate
- * Row and output Row.
- */
+ * It wraps the aggregate logic inside of
+ * [[org.apache.flink.api.java.operators.GroupReduceOperator]].
+ *
+ * @param aggregates The aggregate functions.
+ * @param groupKeysMapping The index mapping of group keys between
intermediate aggregate Row
+ * and output Row.
+ * @param aggregateMapping The index mapping between aggregate
function list and aggregated
+ * value
+ * index in output Row.
+ * @param groupingSetsMapping The index mapping of keys in grouping sets
between intermediate
+ * Row and output Row.
+ * @param finalRowArity The arity of the final resulting row
+ */
class AggregateReduceGroupFunction(
- private val aggregates: Array[Aggregate[_ <: Any]],
+ private val aggregates: Array[AggregateFunction[_ <: Any]],
private val groupKeysMapping: Array[(Int, Int)],
private val aggregateMapping: Array[(Int, Int)],
--- End diff --
The positions of the aggregates in the input are known, right?
So we can also use an `Array[Int]` instead?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---