[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15897655#comment-15897655
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5803:
---------------------------------------

Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3397#discussion_r104466819
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/runtime/aggregate/AggregateUtil.scala
 ---
    @@ -93,6 +94,41 @@ object AggregateUtil {
       }
     
       /**
    +    * Create an [[RichProcessFunction]] to evaluate final aggregate value.
    +    *
    +    * @param namedAggregates List of calls to aggregate functions and 
their output field names
    +    * @param inputType Input row type
    +    * @param outputType Output row type
    +    * @param forwardedFields All the forwarded fields
    +    * @return [[UnboundedProcessingOverProcessFunction]]
    +    */
    +  private[flink] def CreateUnboundedProcessingOverProcessFunction(
    +    namedAggregates: Seq[CalcitePair[AggregateCall, String]],
    +    inputType: RelDataType,
    +    outputType: RelDataType,
    +    forwardedFields: Array[Int]): UnboundedProcessingOverProcessFunction = 
{
    +
    +    val (aggFields, aggregates) =
    +      transformToAggregateFunctions(
    +        namedAggregates.map(_.getKey),
    +        inputType,
    +        forwardedFields.length)
    +
    +    val rowTypeInfo = new RowTypeInfo(outputType.getFieldList
    +      .map(field => FlinkTypeFactory.toTypeInfo(field.getType)): _*)
    +
    +    val intermediateRowType: RowTypeInfo =
    +      createDataSetAggregateBufferDataType(forwardedFields, aggregates, 
inputType)
    --- End diff --
    
    We would need to add this dependency to the flink-table pom.xml
    ```
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.apache.flink</groupId>
      <artifactId>flink-statebackend-rocksdb_2.10</artifactId>
      <version>${project.version}</version>
      <scope>test</scope>
    </dependency>
    ```


> Add [partitioned] processing time OVER RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING 
> aggregation to SQL
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-5803
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5803
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Table API & SQL
>            Reporter: sunjincheng
>            Assignee: sunjincheng
>
> The goal of this issue is to add support for OVER RANGE aggregations on 
> processing time streams to the SQL interface.
> Queries similar to the following should be supported:
> {code}
> SELECT 
>   a, 
>   SUM(b) OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY procTime() RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED 
> PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) AS sumB,
>   MIN(b) OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY procTime() RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED 
> PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) AS minB
> FROM myStream
> {code}
> The following restrictions should initially apply:
> - All OVER clauses in the same SELECT clause must be exactly the same.
> - The ORDER BY clause may only have procTime() as parameter. procTime() is a 
> parameterless scalar function that just indicates processing time mode.
> - bounded PRECEDING is not supported (see FLINK-5654)
> - FOLLOWING is not supported.
> The restrictions will be resolved in follow up issues. If we find that some 
> of the restrictions are trivial to address, we can add the functionality in 
> this issue as well.
> This issue includes:
> - Design of the DataStream operator to compute OVER ROW aggregates
> - Translation from Calcite's RelNode representation (LogicalProject with 
> RexOver expression).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to