Github user StefanRRichter commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3466#discussion_r105390074
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/state/filesystem/FsStateBackend.java
---
@@ -97,6 +100,27 @@ public FsStateBackend(String checkpointDataUri) throws
IOException {
*
* @param checkpointDataUri The URI describing the filesystem (scheme
and optionally authority),
* and the path to the checkpoint data
directory.
+ * @param asynchronousSnapshots Switch to enable asynchronous snapshots.
+ *
+ * @throws IOException Thrown, if no file system can be found for the
scheme in the URI.
+ */
+ public FsStateBackend(String checkpointDataUri, boolean
asynchronousSnapshots) throws IOException {
--- End diff --
I guess this is then typically a case where you could go for a builder
pattern, only problem i see here that this would be API breaking. What do you
think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
