[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15926033#comment-15926033
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3849:
---------------------------------------
Github user godfreyhe commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3520#discussion_r106100087
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/plan/nodes/dataset/BatchTableSourceScan.scala
---
@@ -57,17 +60,24 @@ class BatchTableSourceScan(
)
}
+ override def copy(traitSet: RelTraitSet, newTableSource:
TableSource[_]): TableSourceScan = {
+ new BatchTableSourceScan(
+ cluster,
+ traitSet,
+ getTable,
+ newTableSource.asInstanceOf[BatchTableSource[_]]
--- End diff --
`TableSource` instance in `TableSourceTable` which can be get by
`getTable.unwrap(classOf[TableSourceTable[_]])` has not changed never, and it
may be different from newTableSource.
> Add FilterableTableSource interface and translation rule
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-3849
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3849
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Table API & SQL
> Reporter: Fabian Hueske
> Assignee: Kurt Young
>
> Add a {{FilterableTableSource}} interface for {{TableSource}} implementations
> which support filter push-down.
> The interface could look as follows
> {code}
> def trait FilterableTableSource {
> // returns unsupported predicate expression
> def setPredicate(predicate: Expression): Expression
> }
> {code}
> In addition we need Calcite rules to push a predicate (or parts of it) into a
> TableScan that refers to a {{FilterableTableSource}}. We might need to tweak
> the cost model as well to push the optimizer in the right direction.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
