[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

jingzhang updated FLINK-6067:
-----------------------------
    Description: 
{code}
        val result = table.where('a < 60).select('a * 1.2,  'b / 2, 'c)
{code}
we run the above code in the Batch TableAPI/SQL, we would get the following 
optimizedPlan
{code}
DataSetCalc(select=[*(a, 1.2E0) AS _c0, /(b, 2) AS _c1, c])
  DataSetCalc(select=[a, b, c], where=[<(a, 60)])
    DataSetScan(table=[[_DataSetTable_0]])
{code}
However, we run the above code in the Stream TableAPI/SQL, we would get the 
following optimizedPlan
{code}
DataStreamCalc(select=[*(a, 1.2E0) AS _c0, /(b, 2) AS _c1, c], where=[<(a, 60)])
  DataStreamScan(table=[[_DataStreamTable_0]])
{code}

we can find that in the batch tableAPI/SQL, DataSetCalc which contains 
filterCondition and projectCondition would not be choose as best path.

  was:
{code}
        val result = table.where('a < 60).select('a * 1.2,  'b / 2, 'c)
{code}
we run the above code in the Batch TableAPI/SQL, we would get the following 
optimizedPlan
{code}
DataSetCalc(select=[*(a, 1.2E0) AS _c0, /(b, 2) AS _c1, c])
  DataSetCalc(select=[a, b, c], where=[<(a, 60)])
    DataSetScan(table=[[_DataSetTable_0]])
{code}
However, we run the above code in the Stream TableAPI/SQL, we would get the 
following optimizedPlan
{code}
DataStreamCalc(select=[*(a, 1.2E0) AS _c0, /(b, 2) AS _c1, c], where=[<(a, 60)])
  DataStreamScan(table=[[_DataStreamTable_0]])
{code}

we can find that in the batch tableAPI, the project and filterNode don't merge 
into a single node. However, in the Stream tableAPI, these two nodes could 
merge into one.


> ProjectNode and FilterNode cannot merge in Batch TableAPI/SQL
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-6067
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6067
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Table API & SQL
>            Reporter: jingzhang
>            Assignee: jingzhang
>
> {code}
>         val result = table.where('a < 60).select('a * 1.2,  'b / 2, 'c)
> {code}
> we run the above code in the Batch TableAPI/SQL, we would get the following 
> optimizedPlan
> {code}
> DataSetCalc(select=[*(a, 1.2E0) AS _c0, /(b, 2) AS _c1, c])
>   DataSetCalc(select=[a, b, c], where=[<(a, 60)])
>     DataSetScan(table=[[_DataSetTable_0]])
> {code}
> However, we run the above code in the Stream TableAPI/SQL, we would get the 
> following optimizedPlan
> {code}
> DataStreamCalc(select=[*(a, 1.2E0) AS _c0, /(b, 2) AS _c1, c], where=[<(a, 
> 60)])
>   DataStreamScan(table=[[_DataStreamTable_0]])
> {code}
> we can find that in the batch tableAPI/SQL, DataSetCalc which contains 
> filterCondition and projectCondition would not be choose as best path.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to