[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15946644#comment-15946644
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6211:
---------------------------------------

GitHub user tony810430 opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3637

    [FLINK-6211] [kinesis] Validation error in Kinesis Consumer when using 
AT_TIMESTAMP as start position

    Address the bug in validation function to check if the date string is well 
formed when using AT_TIMESTAMP as start position.
    
    This function needs to check if one of the two conditions is passed, but I 
made a mistake to check all conditions should be passed. That causes the 
problem.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/tony810430/flink FLINK-6211

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3637.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #3637
    
----
commit cb14ddcffdcbbd6fc84619aab475d7b9ff6d1644
Author: Tony Wei <[email protected]>
Date:   2017-03-29T07:08:04Z

    [FLINK-6211] Validation error in Kinesis Consumer when using AT_TIMESTAMP 
as start position

----


> Validation error in Kinesis Consumer when using AT_TIMESTAMP as start position
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-6211
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6211
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Kinesis Connector
>            Reporter: Wei-Che Wei
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 1.3.0, 1.2.1
>
>
> {code}
> private static void validateOptionalDateProperty(Properties config, String 
> key, String message) {
>     if (config.containsKey(key)) {
>         try {
>             initTimestampDateFormat.parse(config.getProperty(key)); —
>             double value = Double.parseDouble(config.getProperty(key)); —
>             if (value < 0) { throw new NumberFormatException(); }
>         } catch (ParseException | NumberFormatException e){
>             throw new IllegalArgumentException(message); }
>         }
>     }
> }
> {code}
> This validation function will always fail regardless of either string format 
> or double type.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to