[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14092389#comment-14092389
 ] 

Hung Chang edited comment on FLINK-1017 at 8/11/14 10:54 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks and cool! 
I tried the solutions mentioned above and get successfully 
(From Chesnay(Online Editing & Branch)) (From Robert(.sh command & Sublime))

Could I ask more understanding regarding setParallelism?

In wordCoundJob the usage is like following.

public getPlan(){               
int parallemlism = 2;
plan.setDefaultParallelism(parallelism);
}

public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
Plan toExecute = tut.getPlan(inputPath, outputPath, parallelism);
}

Does it work like multi-thread and one thread will work for one map function?


was (Author: hungchang):
Thanks and cool! 
I tried the solutions mentioned above and get successfully 
(From Chesnay(Online Editing & Branch)) (From Robert(.sh command & Sublime))

Could I ask more understanding regarding setParallelism?

In wordCoundJob the usage is like following.

public getPlan(){               
int parallemlism = 2;
plan.setDefaultParallelism(parallelism);
}

public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
Plan toExecute = tut.getPlan(inputPath, outputPath, parallelism);
}

Does it work like multi-thread and one thread will take one map function?

> Add setParallelism() to Java API documentation
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-1017
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1017
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 0.6-incubating, pre-apache-0.5
>            Reporter: Fabian Hueske
>            Assignee: Hung Chang
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: starter
>             Fix For: 0.6-incubating
>
>
> The Java API offers {{setParallelism()}} to control the degree of parallelism 
> for each operator. This feature is not documented and should be added.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to