platinumhamburg commented on PR #1459: URL: https://github.com/apache/fluss/pull/1459#issuecomment-3149470997
> The implementation looks good, but it got me thinking about future improvements -- currently, there are a few retry mechanisms around the codebase we could reuse. I'm wondering if it makes sense to introduce a library, like [resilience4j](https://github.com/resilience4j/resilience4j) and create a utils class for resilience handling. WDYT? Does it make sense? cc @wuchong @luoyuxia @swuferhong @polyzos You're right. This PR isn't good enough. We should introduce a reusable infrastructure for fault tolerance logic instead. I'll close this PR for now. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
