wuchong commented on issue #1858:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fluss/issues/1858#issuecomment-3512531518

   @luoyuxia How about we persist all non-sensitive lake properties directly 
into the Fluss table’s properties (excluding any credentials or other sensitive 
fields)?
   
   Right now, we have a lot of fragile logic that dynamically appends lake 
properties during table retrieval. This approach is error-prone and is blocking 
our ability to support multiple lake formats (e.g., Paimon, Iceberg) or 
different lake catalogs cleanly.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to