luoyuxia commented on issue #1858: URL: https://github.com/apache/fluss/issues/1858#issuecomment-3514614836
Yes, I agree that. I created #1963 to track it > [@luoyuxia](https://github.com/luoyuxia) How about we persist all non-sensitive lake properties directly into the Fluss table’s properties (excluding any credentials or other sensitive fields)? > > Right now, we have a lot of fragile logic that dynamically appends lake properties during table retrieval. This approach is error-prone and is blocking our ability to support multiple lake formats (e.g., Paimon, Iceberg) or different lake catalogs cleanly. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
