[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16103351#comment-16103351
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on GEODE-3192:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 0debd20acc290281cd55bf373cd1fec7d1e3e4b0 in geode's branch 
refs/heads/develop from [~WireBaron]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geode.git;h=0debd20 ]

GEODE-3192,GEODE-3229: Change API and implementation of protobuf PutAll. This 
closes #643

* We will now dispatch incoming protobuf PutAlls as a series of put operations
* The PutAllResponse will contain a set of failed keys and the error they 
failed with

Signed-off-by: Galen O'Sullivan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Brian Rowe <[email protected]>


> PutAll on new protocol informs client which keys couldn't be inserted
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-3192
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3192
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: client/server
>            Reporter: Alexander Murmann
>
> When a putAll request fails to insert a given key/value pair the 
> corresponding response will contain information about which keys/values 
> failed to be inserted.
> *Note:* We left this out of GEODE-2997 which initially introduces putAll 
> because we want to get something to test with early.
> *Implementation Note:* The new protocol uses Region#putAll which returns 
> void, but the old protocol uses basicBridgePutAll, which we don't understand 
> but which seems to give more information. Having a look at the old protocol's 
> putAll command could be useful.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to