[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17182148#comment-17182148
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-8444:
---------------------------------------
lgtm-com[bot] commented on pull request #5467:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5467#issuecomment-678498383
This pull request **introduces 1 alert** when merging
84a205b2ea34c92b630843f70f74d3000d3bc85d into
9c31b21d1c23c52f1c047eed696d1db84390aa28 - [view on
LGTM.com](https://lgtm.com/projects/g/apache/geode/rev/pr-cc207c26a67e91efb83a18cb7e2a1d546955b904)
**new alerts:**
* 1 for Reference equality test of boxed types
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> When requester's RVV equals provider's rvvGC, should do fullGII
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GEODE-8444
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8444
> Project: Geode
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Xiaojian Zhou
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> In current design, when requester's RVV equals provider's rvvGC, we treated
> as dominated.
> But if the last operation at provider is a destroy and the tombstone is GCed
> when requester is offline, the provider lost the information about this key
> when GII. So we should do fullGII instead of deltaGII in this case.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
