[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16871722#comment-16871722
 ] 

Michael Jumper commented on GUACAMOLE-302:
------------------------------------------

I've marked GUACAMOLE-731 as a duplicate of this, as it deals with 
automatically focusing the username field when the login page initially 
appears. As mentioned on GUACAMOLE-731, that logic and the logic described here 
seem to intersect if generalized:

{quote}
Perhaps this could be rolled into GUACAMOLE-302. The union of:

* Focus the username field by default.
* Focus the first non-username field after login failure.
* Focus the auth code field for TOTP.

seems to boil down to, simply:

* Clear non-username fields after login failure (the current behavior).
* Focus the first blank field.
{quote}

The WIP pull request submitted by [~mkhan] appears to address both, as well:

https://github.com/apache/guacamole-client/pull/419

> Refocus relevant in-progress login fields after auth failure
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GUACAMOLE-302
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-302
>             Project: Guacamole
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: guacamole
>         Environment: Ubuntu Xenial
>            Reporter: Matt Prager
>            Priority: Minor
>
> After mistyping a Guacamole login password, the current behavior moves the 
> cursor out of the password box (I'm not sure where specifically it moves it - 
> there's no cursor on the screen anymore without clicking back into the 
> username or password box). As, on numerous occasions, I have immediately 
> retyped my password after seeing the "Invalid login" banner only to discover 
> that I then had to type it yet again because I had forgotten to first click 
> into the password box a second time, I think leaving the cursor in the 
> password box for immediate retyping of mistyped passwords would seem to make 
> sense. Thanks.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to