[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-1022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17081769#comment-17081769
]
Nick Couchman commented on GUACAMOLE-1022:
------------------------------------------
[~kangaroo22]: Yes, that's understandable.
Regarding your other points...
* I would not be opposed to coming up with some other graphical representation
for a Load Balancing group vs. an Organizational group. I agree this could be
useful.
* It's been a while since I did anything with Load Balancing groups in
Guacamole, but I seem to remember that it is possible to give users access to
just the load balancing group and not the underlying connections, and they'll
still be able to connect to one of the underlying connections even without
direct access to them or the ability to see them.
> Allow load balancing groups to fail to next connection
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GUACAMOLE-1022
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-1022
> Project: Guacamole
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: guacamole
> Reporter: Jason Keltz
> Priority: Minor
>
> I have 78 hosts in a balanced connection group. Let's say that the first
> host is down. Now, when the user click on the connection group expecting to
> get a connection, they instead get a message that Guacamole can't connect.
> If it can't connect to the first one, it should try the next one, then the
> next one until it finds one that works.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
