[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13697425#comment-13697425
]
Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-3787:
--------------------------------------
bq. I don't think tags should be considered by KeyValue or Cell comparators at
all.
Agreed. Thinking more about it that would be very complex in terms of semantics
and implementation.
I guess we can alter my proposal above to make it so that Incr records count
towards versions, but the cells should have unlimited number of versions to
work.
> Increment is non-idempotent but client retries RPC
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-3787
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3787
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Client
> Affects Versions: 0.94.4, 0.95.2
> Reporter: dhruba borthakur
> Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.95.2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-3787-partial.patch, HBASE-3787-v0.patch,
> HBASE-3787-v1.patch, HBASE-3787-v2.patch, HBASE-3787-v3.patch,
> HBASE-3787-v4.patch, HBASE-3787-v5.patch, HBASE-3787-v5.patch
>
>
> The HTable.increment() operation is non-idempotent. The client retries the
> increment RPC a few times (as specified by configuration) before throwing an
> error to the application. This makes it possible that the same increment call
> be applied twice at the server.
> For increment operations, is it better to use
> HConnectionManager.getRegionServerWithoutRetries()? Another option would be
> to enhance the IPC module to make the RPC server correctly identify if the
> RPC is a retry attempt and handle accordingly.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
