[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13707687#comment-13707687
]
Lars George commented on HBASE-7035:
------------------------------------
Hey [~akvadrako], so this is more like Thrift 1, which stores the tables in a
ThreadLocal instance to keep it open, not using the HTablePool at all? In other
words, you remove the pool here as well, keeping the tables for each scanner
separately? Sounds reasonable to me.
> thrift server closes HTable of open Scanners
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-7035
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7035
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Thrift
> Affects Versions: 0.94.4
> Reporter: Devin Bayer
> Labels: thrift2
> Attachments: old-hbase-thrift-v1.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 4h
> Remaining Estimate: 4h
>
> ThriftHBaseServiceHandler.openScanner() does this:
> 1. table = pool.getTable()
> 2. scanner = table.getScanner()
> 3. table.close()
> 4. return scanner
> While back porting the thrift server to 0.92.6, I found that table.close()
> calls connection.close(). Further calls to scanner.next() raise a
> ConnectionClosed exception. The unit tests do not catch this since they reuse
> an open HConnection instance.
> This might work on trunk, but depends on the implementations of HTablePool,
> HTable and HConnectionManager. Even with the pool wrapper, if the pool is
> full, table.close() may be called, which may invalidate the table. Also,
> HTable is not thread-safe, but they are being reused since they go back in
> the pool.
> I suggest storing the table handle along with the scanner.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
