[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13707816#comment-13707816
 ] 

Lars George commented on HBASE-7035:
------------------------------------

[~madani], ah sorry, you meant the PooledHTable wrapper handed out by the pool. 
Makes sense now. [~akvadrako] is right though, this has changed over time, but 
what we are concerned about today is all sharing the same wrapper, i.e. 
[HTablePool|https://github.com/apache/hbase/blob/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HTablePool.java#L177]
 in 0.94's branch head.

So we are facing the above question then really, should we hold on to the table 
instance or not. I am looking it that now, but please let me know your thoughts.
                
> thrift server closes HTable of open Scanners
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-7035
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7035
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Thrift
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.4
>            Reporter: Devin Bayer
>              Labels: thrift2
>         Attachments: old-hbase-thrift-v1.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 4h
>  Remaining Estimate: 4h
>
> ThriftHBaseServiceHandler.openScanner() does this:
> 1. table = pool.getTable()
> 2. scanner = table.getScanner()
> 3. table.close()
> 4. return scanner
> While back porting the thrift server to 0.92.6, I found that table.close() 
> calls connection.close(). Further calls to scanner.next() raise a 
> ConnectionClosed exception. The unit tests do not catch this since they reuse 
> an open HConnection instance.
> This might work on trunk, but depends on the implementations of HTablePool, 
> HTable and HConnectionManager. Even with the pool wrapper, if the pool is 
> full, table.close() may be called, which may invalidate the table. Also,  
> HTable is not thread-safe, but they are being reused since they go back in 
> the pool.
> I suggest storing the table handle along with the scanner.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to