[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13722992#comment-13722992
]
Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-8846:
--------------------------------------
bq. For sure we are moving exceptions back to their original positions?
What do you think Stack? Should not we do this? My understanding is that we
should have exceptions be in the same level that they are generated / used.
.client for client level exceptions, .regionserver for RS-only exceptions etc.
> Revert the package name change for TableExistsException
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-8846
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8846
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.95.0
> Reporter: Devaraj Das
> Assignee: Devaraj Das
> Fix For: 0.95.2
>
> Attachments: 8846-1.txt, 8846-2.txt, 8846-3.txt
>
>
> I was going through the code changes that were needed for getting an
> application that was running with hbase-0.92 run with hbase-0.95.
> TableExistsException's package has changed - hence, needs a code change in
> the application. Offline discussion with some folks led us to believe that
> this change can probably be reverted back.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
