[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028911#comment-13028911
]
stack commented on HBASE-3833:
------------------------------
bq. 2. I would like to hear from folks regarding what they think of storing
these files in zk. Heck, why shouldn't we store the entire config in zk and the
only config you need is the address of the zk cluster?
Yeah, long time plan is to put all config. up in zk. Would suggest though that
that is out of scope for this issue and that if your aim is to have this
feature work like hadoop's, you not move the includes/excludes there, at least,
not as part of this issue.
Otherwise all else is good. Good on you Vishal.
> ability to support includes/excludes list in Hbase
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-3833
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3833
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: client, regionserver
> Affects Versions: 0.90.2
> Reporter: dhruba borthakur
> Assignee: dhruba borthakur
> Attachments: excl-patch.txt
>
>
> An HBase cluster currently does not have the ability to specify that the
> master should accept regionservers only from a specified list. This helps
> preventing administrative errors where the same machine could be included in
> two clusters. It also allows the administrator to easily remove un-ssh-able
> machines from the cluster.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
