[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13730021#comment-13730021
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-9091:
------------------------------

+1 caveat question to [~mcorgan]
                
> Update ByteRange to maintain consumer's position
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9091
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9091
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Client
>            Reporter: Nick Dimiduk
>            Assignee: Nick Dimiduk
>         Attachments: 0001-HBASE-9091-Extend-ByteRange.patch, 
> 0001-HBASE-9091-Extend-ByteRange.patch, 
> 0001-HBASE-9091-Introduce-PositionedByteRange.patch, 
> 0001-HBASE-9091-Introduce-PositionedByteRange.patch
>
>
> ByteRange is a useful alternative to Java's ByteBuffer. Notably, it is 
> mutable and an instance can be assigned over a byte[] after instantiation. 
> This is valuable as a performance consideration when working with byte[] 
> slices in a tight loop. Its current design is such that it is not possible to 
> consume a portion of the range while performing activities like decoding an 
> object without altering the definition of the range. It should provide a 
> position that is independent from the range's offset and length to make 
> partial reads easier.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to