[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13761078#comment-13761078
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-8884:
------------------------------

Shouldn't MONITORED_RPC be in Handler rather than kept as a thread local in 
RpcServer?  Handler could give it to the CallRunner rather than have it jump 
hoops to get at its stashed instance?

I do not see what benefit CallRunner adds?   It only seems to complicate for no 
apparent benefit (it confuses with its CallRunner name though it is not a 
Runnable even though it implements the Interface).


                
> Pluggable RpcScheduler
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-8884
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8884
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: IPC/RPC
>            Reporter: Chao Shi
>            Assignee: Chao Shi
>             Fix For: 0.98.0
>
>         Attachments: hbase-8884.patch, hbase-8884-v2.patch, 
> hbase-8884-v3.patch, hbase-8884-v4.patch, hbase-8884-v5.patch, 
> hbase-8884-v6.patch, hbase-8884-v7.patch, hbase-8884-v8.patch
>
>
> Today, the RPC scheduling mechanism is pretty simple: it execute requests in 
> isolated thread-pools based on their priority. In the current implementation, 
> all normal get/put requests are using the same pool. We'd like to add some 
> per-user or per-region level isolation, so that a misbehaved user/region will 
> not saturate the thread-pool and cause DoS to others easily. The idea is 
> similar to FairScheduler in MR. The current scheduling code is not standalone 
> and is mixed with others (Connection#processRequest). The issue is the first 
> step to extract it to an interface, so that people are free to write and test 
> their own implementations.
> This patch doesn't make it completely pluggable yet, as some parameters are 
> pass from constructor. This is because HMaster and HRegionServer both use 
> RpcServer and they have different thread-pool size config. Let me know if you 
> have a solution to this.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to