[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13821399#comment-13821399
]
Nicolas Liochon commented on HBASE-9959:
----------------------------------------
bq. taking up BBs but maybe not a big win in this case?
It's difficult to say. Obviously, the region server is much more i/o bound than
the client so saving copies and allocation could be less interesting. I've
fixed these one because they were on the top list when I profiled the objects
creation. I think it's useful at then end. As well, with SSD & so on we might
expect the object creation to be more & more important, so starting to use
ByteBuffer likely a step in the right direction...
> Remove some array copy - server side
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9959
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9959
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Protobufs, regionserver
> Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
> Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
> Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1
>
> Attachments: 9959-trunk.v1.patch, 9959-trunk.v2.patch, 9959.v1.patch
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
