[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13824755#comment-13824755
]
stack commented on HBASE-9869:
------------------------------
Ok. Sounds like it would take a good while for the client to fill up if there
was a leak. Yeah, trie would be better but this is good for now. You opened
an issue on interning TableNames. That patch looks good. We should open
another for ServerName? Makes sense.
> Optimize HConnectionManager#getCachedLocation
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9869
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9869
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Client
> Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
> Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
> Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1
>
> Attachments: 6869.v4.patch, 9869.v1.patch, 9869.v1.patch,
> 9869.v2.patch
>
>
> It javadoc says: "TODO: This method during writing consumes 15% of CPU doing
> lookup". This is still true, says Yourkit. With 0.96, we also spend more time
> in these methods. We retry more, and the AsyncProcess calls it in parallel.
> I don't have the patch for this yet, but I will spend some time on it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
