[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13824866#comment-13824866 ]
Hudson commented on HBASE-9869: ------------------------------- FAILURE: Integrated in hbase-0.96-hadoop2 #121 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.96-hadoop2/121/]) HBASE-9869 Optimize HConnectionManager#getCachedLocation - remove SoftValueSortedMap (nkeywal: rev 1542698) * /hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/SoftValueSortedMap.java HBASE-9869 Optimize HConnectionManager#getCachedLocation (nkeywal: rev 1542690) * /hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HConnectionManager.java > Optimize HConnectionManager#getCachedLocation > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-9869 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9869 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Client > Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0 > Reporter: Nicolas Liochon > Assignee: Nicolas Liochon > Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1 > > Attachments: 6869.v4.patch, 9869.v1.patch, 9869.v1.patch, > 9869.v2.patch > > > It javadoc says: "TODO: This method during writing consumes 15% of CPU doing > lookup". This is still true, says Yourkit. With 0.96, we also spend more time > in these methods. We retry more, and the AsyncProcess calls it in parallel. > I don't have the patch for this yet, but I will spend some time on it. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)