[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13059951#comment-13059951
 ] 

ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-4052:
-----------------------------------------------

I have some doubts and like to get some suggestion before proceeding.
 
Following scenarios needs to be considered.
 Scenario 1:
===========
All the regions are disabled and the state in zookeeper is DISABLED.
Scenario:2
==========
 
The regions are offlined but the AM went down when the zookeeper state was 
DISABLING.
 
Scenario:3
=========
 
The regions are not yet offlined(or only few regions are offlined) and the AM 
went down when the zookeeper state was DISABLING.
 
Now when we do a switch of the master or on restart scenario of master,
how can we decide which regions were offlined and which are not.
 
Though we can get the state of the table as either DISABLED or DISABLING, 
region wise i am not able to infer in what state the region is.
 
So what brings me to get this info is 
 
The soln should be like we need to check for the state of the table while 
populating the regions map in master startup.
 
Checking only for DISABLED state:
==========================
Check for disabled state and those regions that are not in the DISABLED state 
add it into the regions map in master startup.
 
If i check only for the DISABLED state and if the table is in DISABLING state 
and 
 
after master retry (or switch) if i try to enable then we will not be able to 
scan the table because while enabling none of the regions will be enabled
as the regions in META table and the regions that i have populated in the 
regions map are same.
So I will be getting the same issue as in the description of the defect.
 
Checking for DISABLED and DISABLING state:
===================================
if i check the state of the zookeeper for DISABLED and DISABLING and while 
restart of master(switch)  only those regions which are not in DISABLED or 
DISABLING state is populated.
When i again try to enable the region if the region was not offlined as part of 
disable flow(Scenario:3), the waitUntilDone in BulkAssigner is not aware that 
the region was 
already onlined and keeps on waiting as the waitUntilDone() sees for the number 
of regions to become online from the regions map and the actual count it gets 
from the meta table.
This makes enable to go in a loop.
 
Am i clear with the problem? so is it like before enabling any table do we need 
to check the state of the table and if it is DISABLING make all those regions 
to go to
offline mode.

> Enabling a table after master switch is not allowing table scan.  Throws 
> NotServingRegionException
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-4052
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4052
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>         Environment: Linux
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>
> Following is the scenario:
> Start RS and Active and standby masters
> Create table and insert data.
> Disable the table.
> Stop the active master and switch to the standby master.
> Now enable the table.
> Do a scan on the enabled table.
> NotServingRegionException is Thrown.
> But the same works well when we dont switch the master.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to