[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13955780#comment-13955780
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-10866:
-----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12637916/HBASE-10866.patch
against trunk revision .
ATTACHMENT ID: 12637916
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:red}-1 patch{color}. The patch command could not apply the patch.
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9144//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Decouple HLogSplitterHandler from ZooKeeper
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10866
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10866
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: regionserver, Zookeeper
> Reporter: Mikhail Antonov
> Attachments: HBASE-10866.patch, HBASE-10866.patch, HBASE-10866.patch
>
>
> As some sort of follow-up or initial step towards HBASE-10296...
> Whatever consensus algorithm/library may be the chosen, perhaps on of first
> practical steps towards this goal would be to better abstract ZK-related API
> and details, which are now throughout the codebase (mostly leaked throuth
> ZkUtil, ZooKeeperWatcher and listeners).
> I'd like to propose a series of patches to help better abstract out zookeeper
> (and then help develop consensus APIs).
> Here is first version of patch for initial review (then I'm planning to work
> on another handlers in regionserver, and then perhaps start working on
> abstracting listeners).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
