[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13962699#comment-13962699
]
Mikhail Antonov commented on HBASE-10915:
-----------------------------------------
Oh yeah, both such zk fields are optional, that's better..And looks like the
default value is being used now anyway.
Server interface looks appropriate, and it's marked private, so yes, I guess we
could add consensus provider there, and then when we're ready, remove
ZooKeeperWatcher from there (which should only leave within consensus provider
impl, ultimately).
So I actually expanded a bit scope of this jira to cut off the "closing region"
vertical feature.
> Decouple region closing from ZooKeeper
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10915
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10915
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Zookeeper
> Reporter: Mikhail Antonov
> Assignee: Mikhail Antonov
> Attachments: HBASE-10915.patch, HBASE-10915.patch
>
>
> Decouple CloseRegionHandler class and code using it (HRegionServer,
> ProtobufUtil) from ZK API.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
