[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13975963#comment-13975963
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-10994:
-------------------------------

[~giacomotaylor] You are not suggesting that apache phoenix 'solves' 
multi-tenancy, are you?  Instead, I think you meant to write encouraging words 
about the great work [~mbertozzi] is doing here adding primitives to hbase that 
projects like phoenix can make use of and publish nice apis against -- right? 
(smile).

> HBase Multi-Tenancy
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10994
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10994
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Umbrella
>            Reporter: Matteo Bertozzi
>            Assignee: Matteo Bertozzi
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: multitenancy, quota
>
> Currently HBase treats all tables, users, and workloads in the same way.
> This is ok, until multiple users and workloads are applied on the same 
> cluster/table. Some workloads/users must be prioritized over others, and some 
> other workloads must not impact others.
> We can separate the problem into three components.
>  * Isolation/Partitioning (Physically split on different machines)
>  * Scheduling (Prioritize small/interactive workloads vs long/batch workloads)
>  * Quotas (Limit a user/table requests/sec or size)
> This is the umbrella jira tracking the multi-tenancy related tasks.
> An initial design document is up for comments here: 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ygIwZpDWQuMPdfcryckic6ODi5DHQkrzXKjmOJodfs0



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to