[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13976188#comment-13976188
]
James Taylor commented on HBASE-10994:
--------------------------------------
Correct, [~stack]. I should have been more verbose. I just wanted to point out
some similar, complimentary work that is also going on in the hope that all of
this great work can converge (rather than be duplicated). FWIW, a number of
folks in the PhD program at Duke are interested as well and working in this
area. Perhaps some collaboration is in order?
> HBase Multi-Tenancy
> -------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10994
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10994
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Umbrella
> Reporter: Matteo Bertozzi
> Assignee: Matteo Bertozzi
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: multitenancy, quota
>
> Currently HBase treats all tables, users, and workloads in the same way.
> This is ok, until multiple users and workloads are applied on the same
> cluster/table. Some workloads/users must be prioritized over others, and some
> other workloads must not impact others.
> We can separate the problem into three components.
> * Isolation/Partitioning (Physically split on different machines)
> * Scheduling (Prioritize small/interactive workloads vs long/batch workloads)
> * Quotas (Limit a user/table requests/sec or size)
> This is the umbrella jira tracking the multi-tenancy related tasks.
> An initial design document is up for comments here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ygIwZpDWQuMPdfcryckic6ODi5DHQkrzXKjmOJodfs0
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
