[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13986790#comment-13986790
]
Mikhail Antonov commented on HBASE-10915:
-----------------------------------------
bq. But for assignment, we don't need any consensus, right? The
ConsensusProvider naming is a little bit confusing. With ZK-less region
assignment, we need to come up another consensus provider?
No, ConsensusProvider is one class and one instance per Server. For region
assignment it would be one more Consensus class (like CloseRegionConsensus),
not another consensus provider.
> Decouple region closing (HM and HRS) from ZK
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10915
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10915
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Consensus, Zookeeper
> Affects Versions: 0.99.0
> Reporter: Mikhail Antonov
> Assignee: Mikhail Antonov
> Attachments: HBASE-10915.patch, HBASE-10915.patch, HBASE-10915.patch,
> HBASE-10915.patch, HBASE-10915.patch, HBASE-10915.patch, HBASE-10915.patch,
> HBASE-10915.patch, HBASE-10915.patch, HBASE-10915.patch
>
>
> Decouple region closing from ZK.
> Includes RS side (CloseRegionHandler), HM side (ClosedRegionHandler) and the
> code using (HRegionServer, RSRpcServices etc).
> May need small changes in AssignmentManager.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
