[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14017890#comment-14017890
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-11298:
-------------------------------

bq. Note that I've changed the logs, they now belong to the "real" class 
instead of hijacking Hadoop.

RPC DEBUG is verbose, more verbose than all other hbase DEBUG logging so much 
so that it overwhelms.  Above is an old means of enabling RPC DEBUG independent 
of DEBUG level everywhere else in HBASE.  We'd doc'd it here: 
http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#rpc.logging

Maybe not INFO level is default and RPC logging has had an edit, it might be OK 
making it so DEBUG enable'd RPC logging..... have you checked?

Oh, you made the RPC trace-level?  Thats better (include doc change in your 
patch?)

Why we no longer need this: -            if (inHandler) {

Should you pass in the buffer readPreamble works on rather than rely on 'this'? 
 I don't like methods that have side effects; i.e. setting 'this' items if it 
returns successufully. On other hand this new method sets the buffer and 
authmethod... so maybe just leave as is and doc it sets these two data members 
on success.

Otherwise, cleanup looks good to me.  +1 to commit if hadoopqa doesn't burp.



> Simplification in RpcServer code
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11298
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11298
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: regionserver
>    Affects Versions: 0.99.0
>            Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>            Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
>             Fix For: 0.99.0
>
>         Attachments: 11298.v1.patch
>
>
> No important changes here, but I'm doing some other changes on top of this 
> (typically HBASE-11297)
>  
> Note that I've changed the logs, they now belong to the "real" class instead 
> of hijacking Hadoop. I suppose it was historical, but it was as well very 
> confusing.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to