[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14030968#comment-14030968
 ] 

Nick Dimiduk commented on HBASE-11331:
--------------------------------------

In this implementation, the decompressed block does not replace the compressed 
block in the cache. Decompression cost is paid on block access, every time. I 
need to profile the scanner path to ensure a single request is not 
decompressing the same block multiple times. For hot blocks, I expect this to 
result in increased CPU load vs decompressing it only once. For a more evenly 
distributed access pattern, this should greatly reduce the amount of disk seeks 
because more data is cached. I believe the latter use-case is more common.

> [blockcache] lazy block decompression
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11331
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11331
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: regionserver
>            Reporter: Nick Dimiduk
>            Assignee: Nick Dimiduk
>         Attachments: HBASE-11331.00.patch
>
>
> Maintaining data in its compressed form in the block cache will greatly 
> increase our effective blockcache size and should show a meaning improvement 
> in cache hit rates in well designed applications. The idea here is to lazily 
> decompress/decrypt blocks when they're consumed, rather than as soon as 
> they're pulled off of disk.
> This is related to but less invasive than HBASE-8894.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to