[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14055814#comment-14055814
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-11039:
----------------------------------------
If I run the test as a minicluster
{noformat}
$ mvn verify -Dit.test=IntegrationTestBigLinkedListWithVisibility
-Dtest.output.tofile=false
{noformat}
the defaults for ITBLL mean we wait for a long time for jobs to finish. I
didn't have time to wait for the test to get past generation and copying to the
excise and verification phases. We should override the ITBLL and dial down the
node count to something like 100,000 when running on the minicluster.
Looks like the table name for the test isn't overridden in all places:
{noformat}
2014-07-08 20:29:40,807 WARN [Thread-670]
policies.PeriodicRandomActionPolicy(61): Exception occured during performing
action: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TableNotFoundException:
IntegrationTestBigLinkedList
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HConnectionManager$HConnectionImplementation.getHTableDescriptor(HConnectionManager.java:2686)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HBaseAdmin.getTableDescriptor(HBaseAdmin.java:397)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HBaseAdmin.getTableDescriptor(HBaseAdmin.java:402)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.chaos.actions.ChangeVersionsAction.perform(ChangeVersionsAction.java:55)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.chaos.policies.PeriodicRandomActionPolicy.runOneIteration(PeriodicRandomActionPolicy.java:59)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.chaos.policies.PeriodicPolicy.run(PeriodicPolicy.java:41)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
{noformat}
> [VisibilityController] Integration test for labeled data set mixing and
> filtered excise
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11039
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11039
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Test
> Affects Versions: 0.98.1
> Reporter: Andrew Purtell
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.99.0, 1.0.0, 0.98.4
>
> Attachments: HBASE-11039_ITBLL_v1.patch
>
>
> Create an integration test for the VisibilityController that:
> 1. Create several tables of test data
> 2. Assign a set of auths to each table. Label all entries in the table with
> appropriate visibility expressions. Insure that some data in every table
> overlaps with data in other tables at common row/family/qualifier
> coordinates. Generate data like ITBLL so we can verify all data present later.
> 3. Mix the data from the different tables into a new common table
> 4. Verify for each set of auths defined in step #2 that all entries found in
> the source table can be found in the common table. Like the ITBLL
> verification step but done N times for each set of auths defined in step #2.
> 5. Choose one of the source tables. Get its set of auths. Perform a deletion
> with visibility expression from the common table using those auths.
> 6. Verify that no data in the common table with the auth set chosen in #5
> remains. A simple row count with the set of auths chosen in #5 that should
> return 0.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
