[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14105990#comment-14105990
]
Gary Helmling commented on HBASE-9529:
--------------------------------------
For the rest of the coprocessor classes, the limited private tag makes sense.
But I think these HTableInterface methods should be public. They expose a
standard way for clients to access coprocessor exposed APIs, so I would say the
expectation is that clients who may run (but not develop) coprocessors would
use them.
I can open another JIRA for discussion.
> Audit of hbase-client @InterfaceAudience.Public apis
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9529
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9529
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh
> Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: hbase-9529.patch, hbase-9529.v2.patch
>
>
> Similar to HBASE-9523, let's do an audit of the hbase-client public api.
> This is easier to do now that the we can publish only the public api javadoc
> http://hbase.apache.org/apidocs/ (notice it only has Public apis now!)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)