[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14105990#comment-14105990
 ] 

Gary Helmling commented on HBASE-9529:
--------------------------------------

For the rest of the coprocessor classes, the limited private tag makes sense.  
But I think these HTableInterface methods should be public.  They expose a 
standard way for clients to access coprocessor exposed APIs, so I would say the 
expectation is that clients who may run (but not develop) coprocessors would 
use them.

I can open another JIRA for discussion.

> Audit of hbase-client @InterfaceAudience.Public apis
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9529
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9529
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh
>            Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh
>             Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>
>         Attachments: hbase-9529.patch, hbase-9529.v2.patch
>
>
> Similar to HBASE-9523, let's do an audit of the hbase-client public api.  
> This is easier to do now that the we can publish only the public api javadoc 
> http://hbase.apache.org/apidocs/  (notice it only has Public apis now!)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to