[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14111605#comment-14111605
]
Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-11797:
---------------------------------------
Do you want to pick up the HTable changes in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12641764/hbase-10602_v1.patch
as well or you want to do it in the Connection issue?
Can you please add:
{code}
+ * @deprecated use {@link Table} instead
{code} to HTableInterface.java.
Lets keep this signature in HTI only, and add a existsAll() to Table which
returns boolean[], wdyt?
{code}
+ Boolean[] exists(List<Get> gets) throws IOException;
{code}
why the changes in test code? Tests failing because of a different issue?
I'll open another issue to remove HTableInterface, etc from master (2.0 line).
> Create Table interface to replace HTableInterface
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11797
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11797
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Carter
> Assignee: Carter
> Attachments: HBASE_11797.patch, HBASE_11797_v2.patch
>
>
> Basically doing this:
> {code}
> interface Table {
> // get, put related stuff
> }
> @Deprecated
> interface HTableInterface extends Table {
> // users are encouraged to use the new Table interface
> }
> class HTable extends Table {
> // all HTable constructors are deprecated
> // Users are not encouraged to see this class
> }
> {code}
> I'm proposing that in this JIRA I move everything from HTableInterface to
> Table except the following:
> * Anything deprecated
> * Anything @InterfaceAudience.Private ({{coprocessorService(...)}} and
> {{batchCoprocessorService(...)}})
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
