[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14169991#comment-14169991
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-12187:
-------------------------------

[~d.yuan] Thank you for paper, your findings, your previous patches, and your 
now showing up to offer help.  Much appreciated. We have a bunch of work to do 
to address items raised in your paper.

Currently we run findbugs and other checks out of a script as part of precommit 
test on patches.  The script we run is at ./dev-test/test-patch.sh.  We could 
add stuff in here but looking at aspirator as-is, it looks a bit tough to 
integrate (build Chord then put in place files...).  How hard to integrate into 
findbugs?  Then your work would get wide dissemination?





> Review in source the paper "Simple Testing Can Prevent Most Critical Failures"
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-12187
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12187
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: stack
>            Priority: Critical
>
> Review the helpful paper 
> https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/osdi14/osdi14-paper-yuan.pdf
> It describes 'catastrophic failures', especially issues where exceptions are 
> thrown but not properly handled.  Their static analysis tool Aspirator turns 
> up a bunch of the obvious offenders (Lets add to test-patch.sh alongside 
> findbugs?).  This issue is about going through code base making sub-issues to 
> root out these and others (Don't we have the test described in figure #6 
> already? I thought we did?  If we don't, need to add).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to