[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14218091#comment-14218091
]
stack commented on HBASE-12476:
-------------------------------
What about this comment?
bq. From my understanding this is the smallest module the Hydrabase guys could
get up and running enough to pass some tests. Anything less and they were just
putting up code that was broken.
Putting up broke or incomplete contribs doesn't work because in review it
becomes... "hey...this ain't going to work?" or 'Where is XYZ? Why ain't it
included?"
(We just committed a 1.4MB patch yesterday. Ten pages on RB. It took a lot of
reviewing but the contributor was responsive so it was a useful exercise. It
added desirable functionality so was worth the effort.)
Suggest those interested in reviewing start reviewing. First pass might
suggest how the patch might be broken up.
> HydraBase Consensus Protocol
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-12476
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12476
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Consensus, wal
> Reporter: Gaurav Menghani
> Assignee: Gaurav Menghani
> Attachments: 0001-HydraBase-consensus-protocol.patch
>
>
> This is the first patch for the HydraBase consensus protocol implemented
> according to the Raft consensus protocol
> (https://ramcloud.stanford.edu/raft.pdf), as advertised in (HBASE-12259)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
