[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14243758#comment-14243758
]
stack commented on HBASE-10201:
-------------------------------
bq. TestPerColumnFamilyFlush.testLogReplay has tested log replay for selective
flush.
Woah. Thats a nice test. How long has that been around? I missed it in
previous reviews if it was present. I think this test is enough to give us
confidence in this radical change. The kill of master so we don't have latest
seqid is a nice to have but not necessary; we just over replay the edits.
Let me go over your last posted patch. Seems like a bunch of new stuff has
shown up (or I was blind last time I read through the patch).
> Port 'Make flush decisions per column family' to trunk
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10201
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10201
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: wal
> Reporter: Ted Yu
> Assignee: zhangduo
> Fix For: 1.0.0, 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: 3149-trunk-v1.txt, HBASE-10201-0.98.patch,
> HBASE-10201-0.98_1.patch, HBASE-10201-0.98_2.patch, HBASE-10201-0.99.patch,
> HBASE-10201.patch, HBASE-10201_1.patch, HBASE-10201_10.patch,
> HBASE-10201_11.patch, HBASE-10201_12.patch, HBASE-10201_13.patch,
> HBASE-10201_13.patch, HBASE-10201_14.patch, HBASE-10201_15.patch,
> HBASE-10201_16.patch, HBASE-10201_17.patch, HBASE-10201_18.patch,
> HBASE-10201_2.patch, HBASE-10201_3.patch, HBASE-10201_4.patch,
> HBASE-10201_5.patch, HBASE-10201_6.patch, HBASE-10201_7.patch,
> HBASE-10201_8.patch, HBASE-10201_9.patch, compactions.png, count.png, io.png,
> memstore.png
>
>
> Currently the flush decision is made using the aggregate size of all column
> families. When large and small column families co-exist, this causes many
> small flushes of the smaller CF. We need to make per-CF flush decisions.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
