[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14261228#comment-14261228
]
stack commented on HBASE-12762:
-------------------------------
[~apurtell] I took a look and saw this:
14/12/30 07:49:47 INFO mortbay.log: Extract
jar:file:/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/HBase-0.98-on-Hadoop-1.1/hbase-server/target/hbase-server-0.98.10-SNAPSHOT.jar!/hbase-webapps/regionserver
to /tmp/Jetty_0_0_0_0_38973_regionserver____6v0l18/webapp
14/12/30 07:49:47 INFO mortbay.log: Started [email protected]:38973
14/12/30 07:49:47 INFO http.HttpServer: Added global filtersafety
(class=org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer$QuotingInputFilter)
14/12/30 07:49:47 INFO http.HttpServer: Port returned by
webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() before open() is -1. Opening the
listener on 60010
14/12/30 07:49:47 FATAL master.HMaster: Unhandled exception. Starting shutdown.
java.net.BindException: Address already in use
at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Native Method)
at
sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:124)
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:59)
at
org.mortbay.jetty.nio.SelectChannelConnector.open(SelectChannelConnector.java:216)
at org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer.start(HttpServer.java:602)
at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.HMaster.run(HMaster.java:666)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
And it just passed. Let me try it again to see if permanent failing going on.
> Region with no hfiles will have the highest locality cost in
> LocalityCostFunction
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-12762
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12762
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Balancer
> Affects Versions: 0.99.2
> Reporter: cuijianwei
> Assignee: cuijianwei
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.0.0, 2.0.0, 0.98.10, 1.1.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-12762-trunk.patch
>
>
> The locality cost of region will be computed in LocalityCostFunction.cost as:
> {code}
> double cost() {
> ...
> int index = -1;
> for (int j = 0; j < regionLocations.length; j++) {
> if (regionLocations[j] >= 0 && regionLocations[j] == serverIndex) {
> index = j;
> break;
> }
> }
> if (index < 0) {
> cost += 1; // ==> region with no hfiles will have the highest cost
> } else {
> cost += (double) index / (double) regionLocations.length;
> }
> ...
> }
> {code}
> The region with no hfiles(such as empty region) will have the highest cost
> which represents the worst case that region located in the server with no
> locality for hfiles. However, this might be the best case because there are
> no hlogs for the region. Although the absolute cost value won't affect the
> balance process, will it be more reasonable to have zero cost for such
> regions? such as:
> {code}
> ...
> if (index < 0) {
> if (regionLocation.length > 0) { // ==> only consider regions with
> hfiles
> cost += 1;
> }
> } else {
> cost += (double) index / (double) regionLocations.length;
> }
> ...
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
